AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
![]() ![]() On the other hand, sensor nodes are subject to radio frequency interference. Flooding is essentially achieved through a number of unicasts, , and thus more transmissions are required to ensure the flooding coverage than conventional wireless networks. However, in an asynchronous low-duty-cycle WSN, neighboring nodes do not always wake up at the same time. Įxisting flooding protocols utilize the broadcast nature of radio transmission to improve the delivery ratio and reduce transmission redundancy, i.e., a single transmission can be heard by multiple neighbors within the sender’s radio range. Since sensor nodes are usually energy constrained for WSN sustainable monitoring and surveillance applications, they normally operate at a very-low-duty-cycle ( e.g., 1% or less) to ensure the service continuity. During flooding (or network wide broadcasting), messages from a root node are disseminated to the whole network via multi-hop communication. The development of effective flooding protocol is hence a key research topic in this area. In many WSN applications, e.g., factory automation, industrial process monitoring and control, and plant monitoring, flooding is a fundamental network service for remote network configuration, diagnosis or disseminating code updates. On the contrary, traditional wired sensing and automation systems normally require expensive communication cables to be installed and regularly maintained. WSNs offer several advantages over traditional wired industrial monitoring and control systems including extended network coverage, easy and fast installation, resilience against single node failure and cost effective maintenance. Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are important elements for realizing the Internet of Things (IoT), which are composed of tiny wireless sensing devices equipped with data processing and communication capabilities. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate that MDET achieves a comparable delivery latency with the minimum-delay flooding, and incurs only 10% more transmission cost than the lower bound, which yields a good balance between flooding delay and energy efficiency. Due to the NP-completeness of the UDC-MST problem, we design a distributed Minimum-Delay Energy-efficient flooding Tree (MDET) algorithm to construct an energy optimal tree with flooding delay bounding. We formulate the problem as a undetermined-delay-constrained minimum spanning tree (UDC-MST) problem, where the delay constraint is known a posteriori. We show the existence of the latency-energy trade-off in flooding. In this paper, we focus our investigation on minimum-delay and energy-efficient flooding tree construction considering the duty-cycle operation and unreliable wireless links. Despite a plethora of research on flooding problem in the literature, there has been very limited research on flooding tree construction in asynchronous low-duty-cycle WSNs. In many WSN applications, flooding is a fundamental network service for remote network configuration, diagnosis or disseminating code updates. NET 6, and how you can use them to simplify any code where you wanted to wait for a Task, but wanted the await to be cancellable either via a CancellationToken or after a specified timeout.Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) play a very important role in realizing Internet of Things (IoT). In this post I discussed the new Task.WaitAsync() method overloads introduced in. NET 6 adds a further overload that supports both a timeout, and a CancellationToken, saving you one more extension method to write □ In the next post I'll dive into how this is actually implemented under the hood, as there's a lot more to it than the extension method above! Summary In high-throughput code, that could easily become an issue! This would leak a Timer instance until the delay trigger fires in the background. In the extension above, for example, it would be easy to forget to cancel the Task.Delay() call. NET base class library is obviously very handy, but it also helps avoid subtle bugs from writing this code yourself. In that code I used the following function that waits for a TaskCompletionSource.Task to complete, but also supports cancellation via a CancellationToken: static async Task WaitForAppStartup ( IHostApplicationLifetime lifetime, CancellationToken stoppingToken ) In a recent post, I described how to use a TaskCompletionSource with IHostApplicationLifetime as a way of "pausing" a background service until the application starts up. NET 6, how you can use them to "cancel" an await call, and how they can replace other approaches you may be using currently. In this post I discuss the new Task.WaitAsync() APIs introduced in.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |